Mechanics of Solids (about journal) Mechanics of Solids
A Journal of Russian Academy of Sciences
 Founded
in January 1966
Issued 6 times a year
Print ISSN 0025-6544
Online ISSN 1934-7936

Russian Russian English English About Journal | Issues | Guidelines | Editorial Board | Contact Us
 


IssuesArchive of Issues2023-4pp.1351-1369

Archive of Issues

Total articles in the database: 11223
In Russian (Èçâ. ÐÀÍ. ÌÒÒ): 8011
In English (Mech. Solids): 3212

<< Previous article | Volume 58, Issue 4 / 2023 | Next article >>
Nikhil Andraskar, Gaurav Tiwari, Manmohan Dass Goel, and K. Senthil, "Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Layering Thickness on the Ballistic Response of Ceramic/Metal Composite Structure," Mech. Solids. 58 (4), 1351-1369 (2023)
Year 2023 Volume 58 Number 4 Pages 1351-1369
DOI 10.3103/S002565442360071X
Title Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Layering Thickness on the Ballistic Response of Ceramic/Metal Composite Structure
Author(s) Nikhil Andraskar (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440033 India, andraskarnikhil@gmail.com)
Gaurav Tiwari (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440033 India, gauraviitdelhi@gmail.com)
Manmohan Dass Goel (Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440033 India, mdgoel@gmail.com)
K. Senthil (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute Technology Jalandhar, Jalandhar, Punjab, 144011 India, kasilingams@nitj.ac.in)
Abstract Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out using ANSYS-LSDYNA® to know the ballistic performance of the ceramic/metal composite armour structure when subjected to normal impact of 7.62 and 12.7 mm API projectiles. Two distinct ceramic, boron carbide (B4C) and alumina (Al2O3) having backing plates of 6061-T6 aluminum were considered as target materials. Keeping total equivalent thickness constant, 15 mm, the thickness of ceramic and the backing plate was varied in combination of 3-12, 6-9, 7.5-7.5, 9-6, and 12-3 mm. The velocity of both the projectiles was varied in between 600-800 m/s. The obtained numerical results were first validated with the available experimental results and subsequently the ballistic resistance of ceramic/metal targets were compared with the ballistic resistance of Armox-500T steel against identical projectiles. The ballistic performance of the above targets was explored with the residual kinetic energy of the projectile, projectile erosion and kinetic energy absorbed by the target. The kinetic energy absorbed by the target was shown to dissipate into the fragments that leave the ceramic and in plastic deformation. Two different methodologies, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and finite element analysis (FEA) were considered to carry out the numerical simulation to know their ability to predict the ballistic phenomenon. It was found that SPH simulation can properly predict the impact between target and projectile and showed good prediction accuracy. The highest resistance was obtained for boron carbide having 7.5 mm thickness closely followed by 9 mm boron carbide thickness. Target configuration with alumina showed inferior performance as compared to boron carbide target. The results showed that the thickness of front ceramic plate had a significant effect on the projectile erosion. Maximum projectile erosion of 30.6% and 10% were observed for 7.62 and 12.7 mm API, respectively, at velocity of 800 m/s impact velocity.
Keywords ballistic limit, projectile erosion, ceramics, SPH
Received 04 May 2023Revised 06 June 2023Accepted 09 June 2023
Link to Fulltext
<< Previous article | Volume 58, Issue 4 / 2023 | Next article >>
Orphus SystemIf you find a misprint on a webpage, please help us correct it promptly - just highlight and press Ctrl+Enter

101 Vernadsky Avenue, Bldg 1, Room 246, 119526 Moscow, Russia (+7 495) 434-3538 mechsol@ipmnet.ru https://mtt.ipmnet.ru
Founders: Russian Academy of Sciences, Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS
© Mechanics of Solids
webmaster
Rambler's Top100