Mechanics of Solids (about journal) Mechanics of Solids
A Journal of Russian Academy of Sciences
 Founded
in January 1966
Issued 6 times a year
Print ISSN 0025-6544
Online ISSN 1934-7936

Russian Russian English English About Journal | Issues | Guidelines | Editorial Board | Contact Us
 


IssuesArchive of Issues2024-5pp.3068-3096

Archive of Issues

Total articles in the database: 12977
In Russian (Èçâ. ÐÀÍ. ÌÒÒ): 8096
In English (Mech. Solids): 4881

<< Previous article | Volume 59, Issue 5 / 2024 | Next article >>
M.D. Umbharatwala, Manmohan Dass Goel, Gaurav Tiwari, and Nikhil Andraskar, "Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Alumina 99.6%, Kevlar®, Aluminium Composite Armour Panels," Mech. Solids. 59 (5), 3068-3096 (2024)
Year 2024 Volume 59 Number 5 Pages 3068-3096
DOI 10.1134/S0025654424605172
Title Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Alumina 99.6%, Kevlar®, Aluminium Composite Armour Panels
Author(s) M.D. Umbharatwala (Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440010 India)
Manmohan Dass Goel (Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440010 India, mdgoel@apm.vnit.ac.in)
Gaurav Tiwari (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440010 India)
Nikhil Andraskar (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440010 India)
Abstract The current study is focused on evaluating the effectiveness of composite armour made from ceramic, fabric and metal, employing various configurations. Additionally, it incorporates Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to compare the performance of different configurations of composite armour plates having 20 mm thickness against high-velocity hard steel core armour-piercing projectiles, particularly for vehicle armour applications. The ceramic component of the armour comprises hardened alumina (99.6%), Kevlar® fabric-based fibre-matrix composites, and an epoxy blend reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The design of the armour prioritized maintaining a ceramic tile as the frontal impact surface, complemented by an aluminium (Al 2024-T3) plate and a CNT-reinforced Kevlar® composite on the rear. The armour was engineered as a functionally graded composite material with varying levels of hardness and toughness. To ensure equitable comparison across armour plates, the total thickness of the composite was consistently set at 20 mm, and its performance was assessed under two distinct impact velocities: 725 and 550 m/s. A multi-criterion based decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed to comprehensively analyse the armour’s performance across multiple parameters. The study shows that the stacking sequence of the materials significantly alters the ballistic resistance of composite panel despite possessing similar arial density. Also, Certain configurations outperforms others despite having lesser arial density.
Keywords multi-criteria method, decision making, ceramic composite, fabric composite, functionally graded armour, ballistic impact, TOPSIS
Received 29 August 2024Revised 08 October 2024Accepted 14 October 2024
Link to Fulltext
<< Previous article | Volume 59, Issue 5 / 2024 | Next article >>
Orphus SystemIf you find a misprint on a webpage, please help us correct it promptly - just highlight and press Ctrl+Enter

101 Vernadsky Avenue, Bldg 1, Room 246, 119526 Moscow, Russia (+7 495) 434-3538 mechsol@ipmnet.ru https://mtt.ipmnet.ru
Founders: Russian Academy of Sciences, Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS
© Mechanics of Solids
webmaster
Rambler's Top100